Civilization, transmission, and demography
The orcs are at the gate.
Not a metaphor. Not hyperbole. The images coming from Ceuta, from the Canary Islands, from Lampedusa, from the Greek islands, from the streets of Paris and Malmö and Brussels – these are the images of a civilization that has left its walls unguarded and is watching, in real time, what happens next.
Tolkien knew. He had seen it. A generation that went to the trenches and came back — those who came back — understanding that the darkness was not an abstraction, that the Shire could be scoured, that the things worth defending required actual defense by actual people willing to stand at the actual gate. He encoded it in myth because myth is the only language large enough to carry that weight.
The orcs are not evil because they are foreign. They are the organized force of a different civilization, operating by different rules, advancing because the defenders of the gate decided that having a gate was itself the problem. The walls came down not because the orcs breached them. They came down because enough people inside decided that walls were offensive, that gatekeeping was discrimination, that the very concept of inside and outside was a form of violence against those on the outside.
Saruman is the intellectual who made this argument compellingly. Grima Wormtongue is the advisor who whispered it to the king. The king who listened is every European leader of the last thirty years. And now the Shire is being administered by Sharkey, with new rules, new residents, and a bureaucratic apparatus to explain why what you are seeing is not what you are seeing.
Poland stands at the gate. Not perfectly. Not without its own contradictions and failures. But with the specific, hard-won, historically expensive understanding that a nation which does not defend its borders does not remain a nation. That the Shire, once collectivized, is very difficult to restore. That the orcs, once inside the walls, do not leave because you ask them nicely or because a committee issues a resolution.
Sobieski rode down the hill because he understood what was at stake. Because if Vienna fell, Poland was next. Because someone had to hold the gate when everyone else was calculating their own position.
We are at the gate again.
The question is the same as it always was: who is willing to ride?